Files
ferrix/crates/integration-tests/tests/rpki.rs
T
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 9367c38907 Remove policy scripts
Rhai made a decision about a route cost one to three microseconds,
some two hundred times what the same costs in Rust. That was bearable
where a function is asked once for an UPDATE, and is not where every
route is weighed against every peer, as it is when routes are passed
on. What is wanted of a policy (mark routes by where they came from,
mark what is announced, let communities say who is told what) needs no
language; it is to be configuration, done natively.

Kept from that work: route selection goes by a LOCAL_PREF that policy
set on a route from an external peer, and the lab's configuration can
be added to by a phase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 22:47:57 +02:00

402 lines
14 KiB
Rust

//! Route origin validation, end to end: a server that validates against a
//! cache, a peer that announces routes, and the validation data changing
//! under both.
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use std::net::Ipv4Addr;
use std::time::Duration;
use bgp_integration_tests::default_policy;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_cache::TestCache;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_peer::TestPeer;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_server::TestServer;
use bgp_packet::message::{
AsPathAttribute, Message, NextHopPathAttribute, OriginPathAttribute, PathAttribute,
UpdateMessage,
};
use bgp_primitives::ip_prefix::IpPrefix;
use bgp_rpki::{CacheState, RpkiConfig, Vrp};
use bgp_server::config::PeerConfig;
use bgp_server::family::FamilySet;
use bgp_server::policy::ImportPolicy;
use eyre::Result;
use serde_json::Value;
use tokio::net::TcpListener;
const LOCAL_ASN: u32 = 1299;
const PEER_ASN: u32 = 3333;
const TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(5);
fn prefix(s: &str) -> IpPrefix {
IpPrefix::try_from(s).unwrap()
}
fn vrp(p: &str, max_length: u8, asn: u32) -> Vrp {
Vrp {
prefix: prefix(p),
max_length,
asn,
}
}
/// What a test holds on to: the server, and the listener its dialling
/// goes to.
struct Setup {
server: TestServer,
_listener: TcpListener,
}
/// A server that validates against `cache`, with one configured peer at
/// the address the test connects from. Returns once the server has the
/// cache's data.
async fn server_with(
cache: &TestCache,
expire: Option<Duration>,
import: ImportPolicy,
) -> Result<Setup> {
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
let endpoint = listener.local_addr()?;
let cache = cache.address();
let server = TestServer::start_with(LOCAL_ASN, |c| {
c.accept_unconfigured_peers = false;
c.rpki = Some(RpkiConfig {
caches: vec![cache],
// Data never expires sooner than a refresh and a retry take.
refresh: expire.map(|expire| expire / 2),
retry: Some(Duration::from_millis(100)),
expire,
});
c.peers = vec![PeerConfig {
name: "r1".into(),
endpoint: endpoint.into(),
remote_asn: PEER_ASN,
hold_time_secs: 90,
local_address: None,
families: FamilySet::supported(),
add_path: None,
import,
role: None,
require_role: false,
}];
})
.await?;
let rpki = server.rpki.clone().expect("validation is configured");
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while rpki.status().state != CacheState::Synchronised {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
Ok(Setup {
server,
_listener: listener,
})
}
async fn established(server: &TestServer) -> Result<TestPeer> {
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
peer.handshake(PEER_ASN, Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 2), 90)
.await?;
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while server.registry.list().is_empty() {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
Ok(peer)
}
/// Announces `prefixes` as originated by `origin`, reached through the
/// peer.
async fn announce(peer: &mut TestPeer, prefixes: &[&str], origin: u32) -> Result<()> {
let path = if origin == PEER_ASN {
vec![PEER_ASN]
} else {
vec![PEER_ASN, origin]
};
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
path_attributes: vec![
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(path),
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1))),
],
announced_routes: prefixes.iter().map(|p| prefix(p).into()).collect(),
}))
.await
}
fn set(prefixes: &[&str]) -> BTreeSet<String> {
prefixes.iter().map(|p| p.to_string()).collect()
}
/// Waits until the table holds exactly `expected` and the peer has `held`
/// routes held aside.
async fn table_becomes(server: &TestServer, expected: &[&str], held: u64) -> Result<()> {
let expected = set(expected);
let table = || -> BTreeSet<String> {
server
.received_routes()
.iter()
.map(|route| route.prefix.to_string())
.collect()
};
let held_now = || {
server
.registry
.list()
.first()
.map_or(0, |session| session.counters.held())
};
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while table() != expected || held_now() != held {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await
.map_err(|_| {
eyre::eyre!(
"the table has {:?} with {} held; expected {expected:?} with {held} held",
table(),
held_now()
)
})
}
/// A route whose origin is not the one the holder of the addresses
/// authorised is refused. One that is authorised is taken, and so is one
/// that nothing is known about.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_an_invalid_route_is_refused_and_the_rest_are_taken() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.0.0/21", "194.0.0.0/24"], PEER_ASN).await?;
// Someone else's AS as the origin of a covered prefix; and the right
// AS, more specific than it may announce.
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.6.0/25"], PEER_ASN).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.0.0/21", "194.0.0.0/24"], 1).await?;
let client = reqwest::Client::new();
let get = |path: &str| {
let request = client.get(format!("{base}{path}"));
async move { Ok::<Value, eyre::Report>(request.send().await?.error_for_status()?.json().await?) }
};
// Each route says how it stands.
let routes = get("/api/routes/received").await?["routes"].take();
let validity: Vec<(&str, &str)> = routes
.as_array()
.unwrap()
.iter()
.map(|r| (r["prefix"].as_str().unwrap(), r["rpki"].as_str().unwrap()))
.collect();
assert_eq!(
validity,
[("193.0.0.0/21", "valid"), ("194.0.0.0/24", "not found")]
);
// The refused one is on record with its reason. The too-specific one
// was refused before validation came to it.
let refused = get("/api/routes/rejected").await?;
assert_eq!(
refused[0]["by_reason"],
serde_json::json!({"RPKI invalid": 1, "prefix too specific": 1})
);
let peers = get("/api/peers").await?;
assert_eq!(peers[0]["routes"], 2);
assert_eq!(peers[0]["held_routes"], 1);
let rpki = get("/api/rpki").await?;
assert_eq!(rpki["enabled"], true);
assert_eq!(rpki["state"], "synchronised");
assert_eq!(rpki["vrps_ipv4"], 1);
assert_eq!(rpki["cache"], cache.address().to_string());
Ok(())
}
/// Validity changes with the validation data, and the routes follow: one
/// that was taken goes when it becomes invalid, and one that was refused
/// as invalid is taken when it no longer is. The peer sends nothing more
/// meanwhile; it has said all it has to say.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_routes_follow_the_validation_data() -> Result<()> {
let ripe = vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN);
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![ripe]).await;
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
// Nothing is known about 8.8.8.0/24, so it is taken. 193.0.4.0/24 is
// covered, and not for this origin.
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24", "193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 1).await?;
// The holder of 8.8.8.0/24 authorises another AS: the route in the
// table is now invalid, and goes.
cache.set(vec![ripe, vrp("8.8.8.0/24", 24, 13335)]);
table_becomes(&server, &[], 2).await?;
let refused = &server.refusals.peers()[0].1;
assert_eq!(refused.total(), 2);
assert_eq!(refused.recent()[0].prefix, prefix("8.8.8.0/24"));
assert_eq!(&refused.recent()[0].as_path[..], [PEER_ASN, 15169]);
// Both are authorised for the origin they have: both come back, with
// the attributes they were announced with.
cache.set(vec![
ripe,
vrp("8.8.8.0/24", 24, 15169),
vrp("193.0.4.0/24", 24, 15169),
]);
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24", "193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
for route in server.received_routes() {
assert!(
route
.attributes
.contains(&AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN, 15169])),
"{route:?}"
);
}
assert_eq!(server.registry.list()[0].counters.routes(), 2);
Ok(())
}
/// A held route is the peer's to withdraw or replace like any other. One
/// it has withdrawn does not appear when it would have become valid.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_held_route_the_peer_withdrew_does_not_come_back() -> Result<()> {
let ripe = vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN);
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![ripe]).await;
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24", "193.0.5.0/24"], 15169).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 2).await?;
// One is withdrawn, the other announced again with the right origin.
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
withdrawn_routes: vec![prefix("193.0.4.0/24").into()],
path_attributes: vec![],
announced_routes: vec![],
}))
.await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.5.0/24"], PEER_ASN).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.5.0/24"], 0).await?;
// Now the old origin would be valid for both. Neither old route is
// there to be brought back.
cache.set(vec![ripe, vrp("193.0.4.0/23", 24, 15169)]);
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.5.0/24"], 0).await?;
assert!(
server.received_routes()[0]
.attributes
.contains(&AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN])),
"the route the peer has now"
);
Ok(())
}
/// A peer can be exempt: its invalid routes are taken, and shown for what
/// they are.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_peer_can_be_exempt_from_validation() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
let import = ImportPolicy {
accept_rpki_invalid: true,
..default_policy()
};
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, import).await?;
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
let routes: Value = reqwest::get(format!("{base}/api/routes/received"))
.await?
.json()
.await?;
assert_eq!(routes["routes"][0]["rpki"], "invalid");
assert!(server.refusals.peers().is_empty());
Ok(())
}
/// Validation data that no cache has confirmed for too long is dropped,
/// and with it every verdict: routes held as invalid are taken. Refusing
/// routes on the word of data that may be long out of date would be worse.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_held_routes_are_taken_when_the_validation_data_expires() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
let Setup { server, .. } =
server_with(&cache, Some(Duration::from_millis(1500)), default_policy()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
drop(cache);
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
assert!(server.rpki.as_ref().unwrap().current().vrps.is_empty());
Ok(())
}
/// A hijack that was possible: on a session with two-octet AS numbers a
/// route has two paths, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH, and a peer can make them
/// say different things. Here AS_PATH is the peer alone, and an AS4_PATH
/// too long to be used ends at the AS that holds the addresses. The route
/// is the peer's and invalid, when it arrives and when it is looked at
/// again; nothing may take the unused path's word for where it comes from.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_an_unused_as4_path_does_not_make_a_route_valid() -> Result<()> {
use bgp_packet::message::AsPathSegment;
const HOLDER: u32 = 15169;
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, HOLDER)]).await;
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
// No capabilities: AS numbers are two octets wide on this session.
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
peer.handshake_with(PEER_ASN, Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 2), 90, vec![])
.await?;
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while server.registry.list().is_empty() {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
assert!(!server.registry.list()[0].four_octet_asn);
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
path_attributes: vec![
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN]),
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1))),
PathAttribute::As4Path(AsPathAttribute {
segments: vec![AsPathSegment {
ordered: true,
path: vec![3356, HOLDER],
}],
}),
],
announced_routes: vec![prefix("193.0.4.0/24").into()],
}))
.await?;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
// The data changes, and every held route is looked at again.
cache.set(vec![
vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, HOLDER),
vrp("198.51.100.0/24", 24, 64500),
]);
let rpki = server.rpki.clone().unwrap();
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while rpki.current().vrps.len() != 2 {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
// Time enough for the look, and then some.
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(600)).await;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
Ok(())
}