Three independent reviews (hijack resistance, reliability, code health)
of the whole tree. This is what they found that could let a bad route in
or take the daemon down.
Hijacks:
- A route had two paths on a two-octet session, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH,
read in two places by two rules. A peer could make the origin checked
on import differ from the one checked at revalidation, and get an
RPKI-invalid route into the table. AS4_PATH is now merged into AS_PATH
once, on receipt (RFC 6793 §4.2.3), and nothing else knows of it.
- The next hop is judged on import: it must be usable, agreed on
(RFC 8950), and by default the peer itself.
- Our own originated prefixes are not taken from other networks.
- A route for a network the machine is on is never put in the kernel.
- Paths with an AS_SET are refused (RFC 9774).
- A configured peer gets one session, not one per BGP Identifier.
- More IPv6 special-purpose prefixes are bogons.
Reliability:
- A batch of requests the kernel refused could overflow the netlink
socket and end the daemon. The socket has room now, a lost answer or a
silent kernel means asking what is there, and neither is fatal.
- Working the routes out again within the grace period after a restart
no longer drops the routes being kept.
- That work can no longer be put off for ever by interface changes.
- Peers whose sessions keep failing are slowed down.
- Unused attribute sets are swept when they pile up, not only each
minute.
- Log lines a peer can cause are said once in a while.
- An RTR answer is bounded in size and time; data cannot expire between
two refreshes.
- The shard of a key is taken from a stirred hash: neighbouring bits of
the hash proved alike for prefixes in a row. The test that showed it,
failing one run in sixteen, is deterministic now.
The lab has a phase, hijacks, in which FRR tries the first three.
route::apply is a struct with methods instead of nested closures, and
the kernel task's loop is shorter.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A peer's endpoint may be a link-local IPv6 address with the interface it
is on. Such a peer is the address and the interface together, wherever
peers are told apart: admission, collisions, hold-downs, the refusal log,
the status page. The interface is looked up by name each time it is
needed, so one that appears later or is made anew is found.
Our routes go out with our link-local address in both places of
MP_REACH_NLRI's next hop, as FRR sends its own. A peer's link-local next
hop is taken alone, twice, or after "::" (BIRD), and resolved in the
kernel on the interface of the session rather than by looking fe80::/64
up, which every interface has.
The lab has a new phase, linklocal: sessions with FRR (by interface, with
radvd beside the daemon) and BIRD over a LAN with link-local addresses
only, both families, pings across, the interface down and up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A peer's configured role now does three more things:
- Our OPEN carries the BGP Role capability with what we are to the peer.
A peer whose own says it is something that does not pair with that, or
that sends two different roles, is refused with OPEN Message Error /
Role Mismatch. A peer that says nothing is accepted unless require_role
is set. A role on a peer in our own AS is a configuration error.
- Routes from a provider, a peer or a route server are marked Only to
Customer on the way in if they are not already, and our routes are
marked on the way out to a customer, a peer or a route server client.
- A marked route from a customer or route server client, or from a peer
with someone else's mark, is a leak and is refused. No policy setting
turns that off.
The packet crate gains the Only to Customer attribute (malformed:
treat-as-withdraw), and the Role Mismatch subcode is corrected from 8 to
11.
The status page shows whether the peer confirmed its role.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
