Commit Graph
21 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 0829f873f2 Server: the long functions in named steps
Five functions did several things each in one body of 120 to 190 lines.
Each is now a list of steps with a name and a doc comment of their own,
with nothing changed in what they do:

- run_session: hold_down_after, keep_for and release_routes.
- Session::establish: session_handle, validation and route_source. A
  session keeps the peer's settings as one PeerSettings rather than
  eight fields copied out of it one by one; the sweeps' two channel ends
  are named fields, not .0 and .1; whether the peer can be asked to send
  its routes again is a bool, not a copy of the families.
- Fsm::on_open: negotiate_role and negotiate_add_path.
- BgpServer::run: log_startup and spawn_tasks.
- Config::from_proto: parse_listen_endpoints, parse_peers, check_roles,
  parse_originate and Ours::tell_peers, with the three per-peer defaults
  in one PeerDefaults.
- Egress::outgoing: may_go, rewrite and next_hop_for.
- Exporter::follow: Learned::drain, judge and flush, with the three
  things called "announced" told apart (own_announced, learned.announced,
  batches) and the verdicts given a type.

The hold-downs are a module of their own, holddown.rs; policy.rs is
about policy again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 11:32:20 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 3b22e318a2 Server: one way to work on the table off-thread, and smaller tidying
Removing a peer's routes, sweeping its stale ones and sweeping the
attribute sets were each written out as their own spawn_blocking, and
each dealt with a failed task differently: the periodic sweep dropped a
panic on the floor, and a restarting peer whose kept routes could not be
removed was logged as "removed 0 routes". off_thread does it once, and
every caller logs a failure.

Also:
- the hard-reset wrapping of a NOTIFICATION is one function in the FSM;
- the two ways to close every session are one, and the registry has one
  leave() rather than leave() and shutdown();
- the dialer says why a session ended with SessionEnd::reason, and no
  longer turns a result into a result;
- as_path_prepend is parsed in one place, and the limits in error texts
  come from the constants rather than being written out;
- router_id and cluster_id are parsed by one function;
- the exporter builds its Egress in one place;
- the fields a session keeps only to hand to its handle are fewer:
  route_refresh is a bool, not a copy of the families;
- counting the stale routes removed cannot underflow;
- docs that had gone stale: the proto still said there was no route
  reflection, the advertiser's module doc said it announced only our own
  routes, from_server listed two of its five sources, and so on.

Tests for what had none: which session ends count as restarts, the Hard
Reset wrapping, the graceful restart settings, the dialer's jitter,
withdrawals in MP_UNREACH_NLRI, and AS_TRANS on a two-octet session.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 11:15:58 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 befc292215 Tidy the export limits, passive peers and status page code
Readability, no change in behaviour, but for one log line:

- The routes a peer holds from us were counted twice over, differently,
  in the exporter: once per learned-route batch and once per originated
  route. Learned::held_by_peer counts the learned ones in one place, and
  ExportLimits::exceeded_by returns the limit that was passed instead of a
  bool, so that ending the session no longer has to dig it out again with
  a default that could not happen.
- The two hold-downs for a limit passed, ours or the peer's, were two
  near-identical blocks; they are one match.
- How a session ended is put into words in one place
  (SessionEnd::reason), for the dialer's backoff and the passive peer's
  state alike.
- parse_export_limits parses one block; what a missing block means (no
  limits at the top, the top's limits for a peer) is said where it
  differs, instead of Option in and Option out.
- The startup warnings about export limits are a function of their own,
  and the peers without limits are named in one line rather than one
  line each: a router with eighty sessions does not need eighty warnings.
  The warning about a peer without a role is gone: the configuration now
  refuses one.
- Hex formatting of attribute octets is one function; the text for an
  unknown attribute is built in three plain steps.
- The exporter's test fixture returns a named struct, not a tuple.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 10:05:31 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 9cfd3f67f0 Export limits, and a role for every peer where routes are passed on
What other networks were told of rested on one thing: the Only to
Customer mark that routes from providers, peers and route servers get as
they come in. A route without it, from a session without a role or by a
mistake anywhere along the way, went to every peer, from every router of
ours, and nothing of ours stood in the way.

export_limits are a second check, independent of the roles, the marks
and the export policy. For peers above or beside us (PROVIDER, PEER,
ROUTE_SERVER, and any in another AS without a role):

- prefixes: only routes for these go out, learned or our own. With our
  and our customers' space listed, a leak of anyone else's routes goes
  nowhere above us.
- max_prefixes: if more routes were to go out than this, none of them
  does. The session ends with a Cease / Administrative Shutdown whose
  Shutdown Communication says why (RFC 9003), and the peer is held down
  for its import.hold_down_seconds, so that it is told nothing rather
  than too much. The whole table is counted before any of it is sent.

They are set at the top and hold for every such peer that has none of its
own; unlike `export`, a peer's own export policy does not drop them. A
peer's own export_limits take their place, and an empty one lifts them.
Customers, route server clients and our own routers are not limited.

A configuration in which learned routes are passed on and a peer in
another AS has no role is now refused, as is accept_unconfigured_peers
with learned routes: without a role, a peer's routes go to everyone and
it is told of everything. This used to be a warning.

At startup, a warning for each peer the limits apply to that has none,
and for each originated route the limits leave out. A metric,
bgp_export_limit_exceeded_total, counts the sessions ended for it.

The interop lab has a phase in which a customer leaks: a route outside
its space never reaches BIRD, and when more were to go than the limit,
BIRD's session ends and its log has our reason.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 23:10:43 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 b16227c51f Route reflection, with ourselves as next hop
A route learned from one router of our AS went to no other (RFC 4271
§9.2.1), so every router needed a session with every other. A router at
the end of a single link, with one session to its neighbour inside the AS,
heard only of what that neighbour learned itself, and nothing of what the
neighbour had from the routers behind it.

A peer in our own AS can now be made a route reflector client
(`route_reflector_client`, RFC 4456). What a client sends goes to all our
routers; what the others send goes to the clients. A reflected route gets
ORIGINATOR_ID (where it started, if it does not say) and our cluster ID at
the front of CLUSTER_LIST; it is not sent back to the router it started
at, nor round to a cluster it has been through, and one that comes back
anyway is refused as "route reflected back to us". The cluster ID is the
router ID unless `cluster_id` says otherwise. The two attributes are now
decoded as such rather than kept as bytes, and are never sent to other
networks.

Unlike a standard reflector, this one is the next hop of what it reflects,
as it is of everything it announces: there is no resolving a next hop
that is not a neighbour, so a client reaches what lies behind another
router through the reflector.

Only peers in our own AS can be clients; the configuration refuses the
setting for any other. Nothing changes in what other networks are told:
Only to Customer marks go along with reflected routes, and every
receiving session keeps its own max_prefixes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 18:10:35 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 4e945b278f Import rules: preference and communities for some routes only
The import policy did the same to every route of a session. Now `rules`
can do more to some of them: those with certain communities, those for
certain prefixes, or both. Each rule can set the local preference and put
communities on; each route takes the first rule that holds for it.

Rules see a route as the session's own statements leave it, with our
communities taken off and the session's marks put on. So a router can act
on where another router of ours learned a route, by the mark that router
put on it, and a customer's single prefix can be marked for a prepend.

Routes of one UPDATE that different rules hold for go into the table with
attribute sets of their own. An UPDATE that no rule touches is taken as
before, without its attributes being written out again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 16:34:17 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 72444c2706 Control communities: session groups, prepends, and only ours to give
Control communities could say which peers a route goes to, by AS. Now
they can also name sessions by group, and ask for prepends:

  L:11:P .. L:13:P   our AS once to three times more towards AS P
                     (P 0: towards every peer in another AS)
  L:20:G / L:21:G    not to / only to the sessions of group G
  L:31:G .. L:33:G   our AS once to three times more towards group G

A group is a number given to sessions in the configuration (`groups` of
a peer): those at one exchange, or those over one link. The same network
at two exchanges is one AS but two sessions, which is what steering
inbound traffic between exchanges needs. Of several prepends that apply
the most counts, on top of the session's own as_path_prepend. Functions
2 to 9, as the documentation already promised, and 100 and up stay
informational; 10 to 99 are kept for actions to come.

They are acted on where a route leaves our AS, and taken off there; our
informational communities are not. To a peer in our own AS a route goes
with them, unchanged, so that a mark put on at one router is acted on at
another. Before, they were acted on and taken off on internal sessions
too, so a route marked "to nobody" did not even reach our own routers.

And they are ours to give: the communities of our own AS (L:n, L:n:m,
and 0:n where control communities are on) are taken off every route
from a peer in another AS as it comes in, before import marks are put
on. A peer at an exchange could otherwise decide where its routes go
from us, and set our informational marks. A customer that is to steer
its own routes is given import.accept_control_communities. An UPDATE
without any of ours is still taken as it came, without being written
out again.

This changes what a customer that set control communities gets: it now
needs accept_control_communities. The transit example and the interop
lab say so; the lab also has FRR, as a customer, ask for a prepend
towards BIRD's group, and BIRD, as a provider, have its "not to" taken
off.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 16:12:05 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 3609451bdc Ignore our own prefixes from our own routers, and say why a route for a network of this machine is held
Two routers of an AS that both originate a prefix (anycast) each
announce it to the other over their internal session. Each took the
other's route, could not install it in the kernel, since the prefix is
on one of its own interfaces, and so held it, counted as rejected with
"next hop unreachable": a permanent rejection on a healthy session, for
a next hop that was in fact fine.

A route from a peer in our own AS for a prefix this router originates
is now ignored: not taken, not held, not counted. Only that prefix
itself; what is inside it is judged as usual. From other networks such
routes are refused as our own prefixes, as before.

A route that is held because its prefix is a network of this machine,
or inside one (an exchange's LAN prefix, say), is now counted as "prefix
is a network of this router", apart from routes whose next hop cannot
be reached.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 16:11:53 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Opus 5.5 efb2d81a50 Reject blackhole requests with a reason of their own
ci / check (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / docs (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / interop (push) Canceled after 0s
ci / fuzz (push) Canceled after 0s
A route with the BLACKHOLE community (RFC 7999) asks for the traffic to
its prefix to be dropped. Exchange route servers pass these on as host
routes with the exchange's blackhole address as next hop, and they were
rejected as "prefix too specific", which hid what they are.

Routes from EBGP neighbors with BLACKHOLE are now rejected as "blackhole
request", whatever their length. One short enough to pass would have
been taken as an ordinary route, sending the traffic to the blackhole
next hop: the request honoured without anyone having chosen to. Acting
on blackhole requests is not supported; the import policy page and the
standards list say so.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-04 01:03:16 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 1e2e8f2d86 Pass learned routes on to peers, with marks and control communities
What was to be scripted is configuration, done natively:

- import { add_communities, add_large_communities, remove_communities,
  local_pref }: every route taken from a peer is marked (where it was
  learned, say), with nobody else's word for our marks taken, and given
  its preference, which selection goes by.
- export { add_communities, add_large_communities, remove_communities,
  as_path_prepend, learned_routes }, for a peer or for all that have none
  of their own.
- control_communities: the communities by which routes say which peers
  they are passed on to, as exchanges' route servers have them (0:P, L:P,
  0:L, and the large forms L:0:P, L:1:P, L:0:0), taken off as the route
  goes on.

And what the last of these is for: with export.learned_routes a peer is
told the best route of every prefix the others announced. The rules are
BGP's and cannot be turned off: not back where it came from, not to a
peer whose AS is on the path, not between two internal peers, not past
NO_EXPORT or NO_ADVERTISE; our AS on the path and ourselves as next hop
to another network, LOCAL_PREF to our own; to a route server's client
the path, MED and next hop as they came (RFC 7947). Which routes go where
follows from the roles of RFC 9234: a route that came down or across goes
on down only, so that with roles on every peer this makes us transit for
our customers and nothing else. A peer without a role is told everything,
and the daemon says so at startup.

Each session follows the table's best routes with a reader and keeps the
prefixes it has announced, so that it can withdraw them. Routes that go
out alike go in one UPDATE: changes are gathered for 50 ms first, and a
table that is given out anew is gathered whole (at most four sessions at
a time; it is tens of megabytes). For that to work the table's journal
had to give out together what was written together: every change now
carries a time on a table-wide clock, a reader's pass reads every shard
up to one time, no further than the changes that are complete in every
shard, and a resync takes its places in the journals as of one time.

One peer sending 1.23 M routes over a session, another told of them:
in our table after 0.47 s, all heard after 2.1 s, four routes an UPDATE.
The lab has a phase, transit: FRR as our customer and BIRD as our
provider, routes each way with the right paths and marks, one kept back
by a community, and pings between their networks through us.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 23:48:08 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 9367c38907 Remove policy scripts
Rhai made a decision about a route cost one to three microseconds,
some two hundred times what the same costs in Rust. That was bearable
where a function is asked once for an UPDATE, and is not where every
route is weighed against every peer, as it is when routes are passed
on. What is wanted of a policy (mark routes by where they came from,
mark what is announced, let communities say who is told what) needs no
language; it is to be configuration, done natively.

Kept from that work: route selection goes by a LOCAL_PREF that policy
set on a route from an external peer, and the lab's configuration can
be added to by a phase.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 22:47:57 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 cbf0df1eef Policy scripts: the operator's own rules for routes, in Rhai
A new crate, bgp-policy, runs functions of a script on routes: on their
way in, after the general checks of a peer's import and before the
checks that can change (RPKI, next hop reachability); and on their way
out to a peer. A function is given the route and the peer, may refuse
the route, and may change its communities, large communities,
LOCAL_PREF and MED, and on the way out prepend our AS:

    fn from_peer(route, peer) {
        if route.has_community("65535:666") { return false; }
        route.add_community(LEARNED_FROM[peer.role]);
        route.local_pref = PREFERENCE[peer.role];
        true
    }

Configuration: policy { path | source, import_function, export_function }
and, for a peer, import { function } and export { function }. The script
is compiled at startup; `bgp --check` reads it and says which function
is whose. A function that fails on a route has refused it. Scripts have
no files, network or clock, and are stopped after 200,000 steps.

Route selection now goes by a LOCAL_PREF on a route from an external
peer: the decoder never lets a peer's own through, so one that is there
was set by policy.

What it costs was measured before it was built on (benches/policy.rs):
a call that tests a few communities and changes two takes 1 to 3
microseconds, some two hundred times what Rust would. So a function is
asked once for the routes of an UPDATE, which share their attributes,
unless it asks for the prefix. One peer sending 1.23 M routes over a
session: 0.37 s without a function, 0.80 s with one that marks and
ranks every route, 3.4 s if it also looks at the prefix.

Export applies to what is announced, which today is what the daemon
originates; learned routes are not passed on yet.

Tested by unit tests of the crate, sessions end to end, a fuzz target on
the example script (testdata/policy.rhai), and a lab phase in which a
script changes which of FRR's and BIRD's route is chosen and what each
of them is told.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 21:09:39 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 f1d80c66df Do not choose a route whose next hop cannot be reached (RFC 4271 §9.1.2.1)
Where routes go into the kernel, a route the kernel could not be given
is no longer taken into the table: its next hop is no neighbor on any
interface, or its prefix is a network the machine is itself on. Such a
route used to be able to win selection and then leave its prefix without
a route in the kernel, though another peer had one that worked.

It is held aside the way an RPKI-invalid route is, and by the same
means: judged on arrival against the interfaces as the kernel last
described them, looked for in the table when they change, and taken
from what is held when its next hop can be reached. The fib publishes
the interfaces for this; the next hop is resolved once for an UPDATE
and not for each of its routes.

The lab has a phase, nexthops: FRR's better route with a next hop that
is nowhere is held and BIRD's is installed, and they change places as
an address comes and goes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 20:29:31 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 3d946c32ce Code health after review: docs, metrics, structure, one more fuzz target
What the code-health review found, and what a fuzz target written for it
found in its first seconds.

- A set of attributes with the same attribute twice is refused by the
  routing table. Its readers (the selection key, the path, the next hop)
  could each take a different one of the two. The decoder never lets one
  through; the new fuzz target `attrs` found that the table would.
- bgp_peer_up{peer}, to alert on a peer going away, and bgp_build_info.
  Every metric is there from the first scrape. Alerts for a peer down,
  hijack attempts and kernel errors are in the README.
- `bgp --check config` validates a configuration without starting, and
  `--version` says which build it is. CI runs the first on the example
  configuration, which a test now also parses with its commented fields
  put in; the example had to learn about the next hop check.
- Path attributes have a module of their own, packet::attributes,
  re-exported from packet::message as before.
- policy::From, which shadowed the trait, is RouteSource. The server's
  connection, dialer and fsm modules are private. Logging arguments live
  in the binary; the server library no longer depends on clap.
- One is_unicast_link_local (the standard library's) instead of two of
  our own; SelectionKey::origin(); one place where an Import is made.
- READMEs say what the daemon does today rather than what it did not do
  a year ago. Documentation links are checked in CI. Unused dependencies
  and bgp_web::serve are gone; the Docker build is --locked and does not
  ship the fuzz corpus.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 19:31:19 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 9ca86ede2f Harden import, the kernel task and the RTR client after review
Three independent reviews (hijack resistance, reliability, code health)
of the whole tree. This is what they found that could let a bad route in
or take the daemon down.

Hijacks:
- A route had two paths on a two-octet session, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH,
  read in two places by two rules. A peer could make the origin checked
  on import differ from the one checked at revalidation, and get an
  RPKI-invalid route into the table. AS4_PATH is now merged into AS_PATH
  once, on receipt (RFC 6793 §4.2.3), and nothing else knows of it.
- The next hop is judged on import: it must be usable, agreed on
  (RFC 8950), and by default the peer itself.
- Our own originated prefixes are not taken from other networks.
- A route for a network the machine is on is never put in the kernel.
- Paths with an AS_SET are refused (RFC 9774).
- A configured peer gets one session, not one per BGP Identifier.
- More IPv6 special-purpose prefixes are bogons.

Reliability:
- A batch of requests the kernel refused could overflow the netlink
  socket and end the daemon. The socket has room now, a lost answer or a
  silent kernel means asking what is there, and neither is fatal.
- Working the routes out again within the grace period after a restart
  no longer drops the routes being kept.
- That work can no longer be put off for ever by interface changes.
- Peers whose sessions keep failing are slowed down.
- Unused attribute sets are swept when they pile up, not only each
  minute.
- Log lines a peer can cause are said once in a while.
- An RTR answer is bounded in size and time; data cannot expire between
  two refreshes.
- The shard of a key is taken from a stirred hash: neighbouring bits of
  the hash proved alike for prefixes in a row. The test that showed it,
  failing one run in sixteen, is deterministic now.

The lab has a phase, hijacks, in which FRR tries the first three.
route::apply is a struct with methods instead of nested closures, and
the kernel task's loop is shorter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 19:13:40 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 fd2248feb5 Peer at link-local addresses: fe80::1%eth0
A peer's endpoint may be a link-local IPv6 address with the interface it
is on. Such a peer is the address and the interface together, wherever
peers are told apart: admission, collisions, hold-downs, the refusal log,
the status page. The interface is looked up by name each time it is
needed, so one that appears later or is made anew is found.

Our routes go out with our link-local address in both places of
MP_REACH_NLRI's next hop, as FRR sends its own. A peer's link-local next
hop is taken alone, twice, or after "::" (BIRD), and resolved in the
kernel on the interface of the session rather than by looking fe80::/64
up, which every interface has.

The lab has a new phase, linklocal: sessions with FRR (by interface, with
radvd beside the daemon) and BIRD over a LAN with link-local addresses
only, both families, pings across, the interface down and up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 18:24:13 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 f9ef781d51 Check roles in OPEN and prevent route leaks with Only to Customer (RFC 9234)
A peer's configured role now does three more things:

- Our OPEN carries the BGP Role capability with what we are to the peer.
  A peer whose own says it is something that does not pair with that, or
  that sends two different roles, is refused with OPEN Message Error /
  Role Mismatch. A peer that says nothing is accepted unless require_role
  is set. A role on a peer in our own AS is a configuration error.
- Routes from a provider, a peer or a route server are marked Only to
  Customer on the way in if they are not already, and our routes are
  marked on the way out to a customer, a peer or a route server client.
- A marked route from a customer or route server client, or from a peer
  with someone else's mark, is a leak and is refused. No policy setting
  turns that off.

The packet crate gains the Only to Customer attribute (malformed:
treat-as-withdraw), and the Role Mismatch subcode is corrected from 8 to
11.

The status page shows whether the peer confirmed its role.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:27:36 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 8086aa994f Verify AS paths with ASPAs, over RTR version 2
Origin validation says who may originate a prefix and nothing about the
rest of the path: it does not catch a route leak, nor a hijack that keeps
the right origin at the end of a made-up path. ASPAs, in which a network
lists its providers, do.

bgp-rpki:
- aspa: the ASPAs and the upstream and downstream verification procedures
  of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-24, tested against the draft's
  wording as written.
- rtr: protocol version 2 (draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-23) with the ASPA
  PDU and the new error codes.
- client: asks for version 2 and falls back to whatever older version the
  cache speaks; keeps ASPAs with the VRPs, applied whole or not at all;
  publishes which customers' ASPAs changed; tells the cache why it is
  being left (Error Report); does not ask one version's serial of another.

Server:
- A peer has a role (provider, customer, peer, route server, route server
  client), which decides how its paths are verified. Without one they are
  not.
- A route whose path is invalid is refused ("ASPA invalid") and held, like
  one with an invalid origin; accept_aspa_invalid exempts a peer.
- When ASPAs change, routes in the table whose path has a changed customer
  on it are verified again, and held routes are released when they pass
  both checks.
- The revalidator finds a route's peer by index instead of searching a
  list for every route.

The status page and API show each peer's role, each route's path validity,
the number of ASPAs and the RTR version in use; bgp_rpki_aspas is on
/metricz.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:12:59 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 bdaf226a16 Validate route origins against the RPKI and refuse invalid routes
With rpki { caches { ... } } in the configuration the server keeps the
validated ROA payloads of a validator and validates every route from a
peer outside its own AS (RFC 6811). An invalid route is refused, unless
its peer has accept_rpki_invalid. Valid and not-found routes are taken;
validity does not otherwise enter route selection.

Validity is not settled when a route arrives: the data changes every few
minutes. The routes follow, without the peer sending anything again.

- A route refused as invalid is held by its session, out of the table.
  When the data changes the session looks at what it holds, and what is
  no longer invalid goes into the table. A held route is the peer's to
  withdraw or replace like any other.
- A route in the table that becomes invalid is found by a task that
  looks through the table when the data changes, at the prefixes the
  changed VRPs cover, and is taken out and held by its session.
- If the data expires because no cache confirms it, nothing is invalid
  any more and everything held is taken.
- A session holds at most 200,000 routes; past that it asks the peer for
  a route refresh when the data changes.

So that the table can be looked through without parsing attributes, an
attribute set's key now has the route's origin AS. Memory per route is
unchanged at 52 bytes on the real table.

Shown: /api/rpki and a section of the status page with the cache, its
state and the age of the data; each route's validity; each peer's count
of held routes. Refusals are recorded under "RPKI invalid". Metrics:
bgp_rpki_vrps and bgp_rpki_updates_total.

Also: Negotiated says whether the peer supports route refresh, and
docs/RFCs.md is brought up to date.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 13:39:40 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 599cd0ad8b Look routes up, and see and alert on the ones that were refused
Two things were hard to find out from the status page and the API: what
the table has for a given prefix or address, and what a peer announced
that was refused and why.

Looking up. /api/routes/received takes a query, and the status page has
a box for it:
- prefix: every route for that prefix, the best first;
- address: every prefix that covers the address, most specific first;
- within: a prefix and everything inside it;
- peer (by name or address) and best narrow any of these.
A query that makes no sense is answered 400 with the reason, which the
page shows. Results come in address order. Routes are shown with the
peer's configured name.

Refused routes. A refused route is not stored, so until now there was
only a count. For each peer the server now keeps how many routes were
refused for each reason, and the latest 200 with the AS path they came
with. The record is kept by the peer's address and outlives the
session, so that a peer that was cut off can still be looked into. It is
at /api/routes/rejected and in a new section of the status page; the
peers table links to it.

Alerting. bgp_routes_rejected_total is now by peer as well as reason.
New: bgp_peer_routes and bgp_peer_max_prefixes, to see a peer nearing
its limit, and bgp_prefix_limit_exceeded_total. The README has rules to
start from. The log has a line for a peer's first refused route and
then at most one a minute, with the count of the others.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 13:14:41 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 e2b1979e38 Judge every route a peer announces: import policy, prefix limit, hold-down
A configured peer could announce any prefix with any path, in any
number, and all of it was stored and could be chosen as best. Each
peer now has an import policy, and every route goes through it before
it reaches the routing table.

Checks that hold for any peer unless turned off for it:
- no prefixes that are not routed on the Internet (private, loopback,
  link-local, documentation, multicast, reserved; for IPv6, anything
  outside global unicast);
- nothing longer than /24 or /48, no default route, nothing shorter
  than /8 or /16;
- no reserved, private or documentation AS number in the path;
- a path that begins with the peer's own AS (turned off for a route
  server), and of at most 64 AS numbers.

Always: a route with our own AS number in its path is refused. RFC 4271
requires this loop check and it was missing.

Per peer, if configured: the prefixes it may announce, each with an
optional longest more-specific, and the AS numbers its routes may
originate from. This is the list generated from the routing registries.

max_prefixes limits how many routes a peer may have. One more ends the
session with Cease / Maximum Number of Prefixes Reached, and the peer
is kept down for hold_down_seconds (ten minutes unless set): its
connections are not taken and it is not dialled. Refused routes do not
count towards the limit.

A refused route is withdrawn rather than ignored, so that it replaces
whatever the peer had announced for it before.

On a session with two-octet AS numbers the path is judged with its
AS4_PATH merged in, so that the real AS numbers are what is checked.

Peers that are not configured (accept_unconfigured_peers, for test
networks) get a policy that takes everything but loops.

Refusals are counted in bgp_routes_rejected_total by reason. The status
page and /api/peers show, for each session, how many routes the peer
has and how many were refused. The server warns at startup about peers
with no limit.

The prefix check costs about 4 ns a route with the default policy; the
end-to-end benchmark is unchanged.

Also: the benchmark's server AS is one that is in none of its generated
paths, and a table test that depended on the hasher's seed is fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 12:59:37 +02:00