A route learned from one router of our AS went to no other (RFC 4271 §9.2.1), so every router needed a session with every other. A router at the end of a single link, with one session to its neighbour inside the AS, heard only of what that neighbour learned itself, and nothing of what the neighbour had from the routers behind it. A peer in our own AS can now be made a route reflector client (`route_reflector_client`, RFC 4456). What a client sends goes to all our routers; what the others send goes to the clients. A reflected route gets ORIGINATOR_ID (where it started, if it does not say) and our cluster ID at the front of CLUSTER_LIST; it is not sent back to the router it started at, nor round to a cluster it has been through, and one that comes back anyway is refused as "route reflected back to us". The cluster ID is the router ID unless `cluster_id` says otherwise. The two attributes are now decoded as such rather than kept as bytes, and are never sent to other networks. Unlike a standard reflector, this one is the next hop of what it reflects, as it is of everything it announces: there is no resolving a next hop that is not a neighbour, so a client reaches what lies behind another router through the reflector. Only peers in our own AS can be clients; the configuration refuses the setting for any other. Nothing changes in what other networks are told: Only to Customer marks go along with reflected routes, and every receiving session keeps its own max_prefixes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
406 lines
15 KiB
Rust
406 lines
15 KiB
Rust
//! Route origin validation, end to end: a server that validates against a
|
|
//! cache, a peer that announces routes, and the validation data changing
|
|
//! under both.
|
|
|
|
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
|
|
use std::net::Ipv4Addr;
|
|
use std::time::Duration;
|
|
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::default_policy;
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::test_cache::TestCache;
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::test_peer::TestPeer;
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::test_server::TestServer;
|
|
use bgp_packet::message::{
|
|
AsPathAttribute, Message, NextHopPathAttribute, OriginPathAttribute, PathAttribute,
|
|
UpdateMessage,
|
|
};
|
|
use bgp_primitives::ip_prefix::IpPrefix;
|
|
use bgp_rpki::{CacheState, RpkiConfig, Vrp};
|
|
use bgp_server::config::PeerConfig;
|
|
use bgp_server::family::FamilySet;
|
|
use bgp_server::policy::ImportPolicy;
|
|
use eyre::Result;
|
|
use serde_json::Value;
|
|
use tokio::net::TcpListener;
|
|
|
|
const LOCAL_ASN: u32 = 1299;
|
|
const PEER_ASN: u32 = 3333;
|
|
const TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(5);
|
|
|
|
fn prefix(s: &str) -> IpPrefix {
|
|
IpPrefix::try_from(s).unwrap()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn vrp(p: &str, max_length: u8, asn: u32) -> Vrp {
|
|
Vrp {
|
|
prefix: prefix(p),
|
|
max_length,
|
|
asn,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// What a test holds on to: the server, and the listener its dialling
|
|
/// goes to.
|
|
struct Setup {
|
|
server: TestServer,
|
|
_listener: TcpListener,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A server that validates against `cache`, with one configured peer at
|
|
/// the address the test connects from. Returns once the server has the
|
|
/// cache's data.
|
|
async fn server_with(
|
|
cache: &TestCache,
|
|
expire: Option<Duration>,
|
|
import: ImportPolicy,
|
|
) -> Result<Setup> {
|
|
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
|
|
let endpoint = listener.local_addr()?;
|
|
let cache = cache.address();
|
|
let server = TestServer::start_with(LOCAL_ASN, |c| {
|
|
c.accept_unconfigured_peers = false;
|
|
c.rpki = Some(RpkiConfig {
|
|
caches: vec![cache],
|
|
// Data never expires sooner than a refresh and a retry take.
|
|
refresh: expire.map(|expire| expire / 2),
|
|
retry: Some(Duration::from_millis(100)),
|
|
expire,
|
|
});
|
|
c.peers = vec![PeerConfig {
|
|
graceful_restart: Default::default(),
|
|
groups: Vec::new(),
|
|
reflector_client: false,
|
|
name: "r1".into(),
|
|
endpoint: endpoint.into(),
|
|
remote_asn: PEER_ASN,
|
|
hold_time_secs: 90,
|
|
local_address: None,
|
|
families: FamilySet::supported(),
|
|
add_path: None,
|
|
import,
|
|
role: None,
|
|
require_role: false,
|
|
export: Default::default(),
|
|
}];
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
let rpki = server.rpki.clone().expect("validation is configured");
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while rpki.status().state != CacheState::Synchronised {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
Ok(Setup {
|
|
server,
|
|
_listener: listener,
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async fn established(server: &TestServer) -> Result<TestPeer> {
|
|
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
peer.handshake(PEER_ASN, Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 2), 90)
|
|
.await?;
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while server.registry.list().is_empty() {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
Ok(peer)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Announces `prefixes` as originated by `origin`, reached through the
|
|
/// peer.
|
|
async fn announce(peer: &mut TestPeer, prefixes: &[&str], origin: u32) -> Result<()> {
|
|
let path = if origin == PEER_ASN {
|
|
vec![PEER_ASN]
|
|
} else {
|
|
vec![PEER_ASN, origin]
|
|
};
|
|
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
|
|
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
|
|
path_attributes: vec![
|
|
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
|
|
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(path),
|
|
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1))),
|
|
],
|
|
announced_routes: prefixes.iter().map(|p| prefix(p).into()).collect(),
|
|
}))
|
|
.await
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn set(prefixes: &[&str]) -> BTreeSet<String> {
|
|
prefixes.iter().map(|p| p.to_string()).collect()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Waits until the table holds exactly `expected` and the peer has `held`
|
|
/// routes held aside.
|
|
async fn table_becomes(server: &TestServer, expected: &[&str], held: u64) -> Result<()> {
|
|
let expected = set(expected);
|
|
let table = || -> BTreeSet<String> {
|
|
server
|
|
.received_routes()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|route| route.prefix.to_string())
|
|
.collect()
|
|
};
|
|
let held_now = || {
|
|
server
|
|
.registry
|
|
.list()
|
|
.first()
|
|
.map_or(0, |session| session.counters.held())
|
|
};
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while table() != expected || held_now() != held {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await
|
|
.map_err(|_| {
|
|
eyre::eyre!(
|
|
"the table has {:?} with {} held; expected {expected:?} with {held} held",
|
|
table(),
|
|
held_now()
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A route whose origin is not the one the holder of the addresses
|
|
/// authorised is refused. One that is authorised is taken, and so is one
|
|
/// that nothing is known about.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_an_invalid_route_is_refused_and_the_rest_are_taken() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
|
|
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
|
|
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
|
|
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.0.0/21", "194.0.0.0/24"], PEER_ASN).await?;
|
|
// Someone else's AS as the origin of a covered prefix; and the right
|
|
// AS, more specific than it may announce.
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.6.0/25"], PEER_ASN).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.0.0/21", "194.0.0.0/24"], 1).await?;
|
|
|
|
let client = reqwest::Client::new();
|
|
let get = |path: &str| {
|
|
let request = client.get(format!("{base}{path}"));
|
|
async move { Ok::<Value, eyre::Report>(request.send().await?.error_for_status()?.json().await?) }
|
|
};
|
|
// Each route says how it stands.
|
|
let routes = get("/api/routes/received").await?["routes"].take();
|
|
let validity: Vec<(&str, &str)> = routes
|
|
.as_array()
|
|
.unwrap()
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|r| (r["prefix"].as_str().unwrap(), r["rpki"].as_str().unwrap()))
|
|
.collect();
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
validity,
|
|
[("193.0.0.0/21", "valid"), ("194.0.0.0/24", "not found")]
|
|
);
|
|
// The refused one is on record with its reason. The too-specific one
|
|
// was refused before validation came to it.
|
|
let refused = get("/api/routes/rejected").await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(
|
|
refused[0]["by_reason"],
|
|
serde_json::json!({"RPKI invalid": 1, "prefix too specific": 1})
|
|
);
|
|
let peers = get("/api/peers").await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(peers[0]["routes"], 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(peers[0]["held_routes"], 1);
|
|
|
|
let rpki = get("/api/rpki").await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(rpki["enabled"], true);
|
|
assert_eq!(rpki["state"], "synchronised");
|
|
assert_eq!(rpki["vrps_ipv4"], 1);
|
|
assert_eq!(rpki["cache"], cache.address().to_string());
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Validity changes with the validation data, and the routes follow: one
|
|
/// that was taken goes when it becomes invalid, and one that was refused
|
|
/// as invalid is taken when it no longer is. The peer sends nothing more
|
|
/// meanwhile; it has said all it has to say.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_routes_follow_the_validation_data() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let ripe = vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN);
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![ripe]).await;
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
|
|
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
|
|
|
|
// Nothing is known about 8.8.8.0/24, so it is taken. 193.0.4.0/24 is
|
|
// covered, and not for this origin.
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24", "193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 1).await?;
|
|
|
|
// The holder of 8.8.8.0/24 authorises another AS: the route in the
|
|
// table is now invalid, and goes.
|
|
cache.set(vec![ripe, vrp("8.8.8.0/24", 24, 13335)]);
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &[], 2).await?;
|
|
let refused = &server.refusals.peers()[0].1;
|
|
assert_eq!(refused.total(), 2);
|
|
assert_eq!(refused.recent()[0].prefix, prefix("8.8.8.0/24"));
|
|
assert_eq!(&refused.recent()[0].as_path[..], [PEER_ASN, 15169]);
|
|
|
|
// Both are authorised for the origin they have: both come back, with
|
|
// the attributes they were announced with.
|
|
cache.set(vec![
|
|
ripe,
|
|
vrp("8.8.8.0/24", 24, 15169),
|
|
vrp("193.0.4.0/24", 24, 15169),
|
|
]);
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24", "193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
|
|
for route in server.received_routes() {
|
|
assert!(
|
|
route
|
|
.attributes
|
|
.contains(&AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN, 15169])),
|
|
"{route:?}"
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
assert_eq!(server.registry.list()[0].counters.routes(), 2);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A held route is the peer's to withdraw or replace like any other. One
|
|
/// it has withdrawn does not appear when it would have become valid.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_a_held_route_the_peer_withdrew_does_not_come_back() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let ripe = vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN);
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![ripe]).await;
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
|
|
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
|
|
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24", "193.0.5.0/24"], 15169).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &[], 2).await?;
|
|
|
|
// One is withdrawn, the other announced again with the right origin.
|
|
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
|
|
withdrawn_routes: vec![prefix("193.0.4.0/24").into()],
|
|
path_attributes: vec![],
|
|
announced_routes: vec![],
|
|
}))
|
|
.await?;
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.5.0/24"], PEER_ASN).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.5.0/24"], 0).await?;
|
|
|
|
// Now the old origin would be valid for both. Neither old route is
|
|
// there to be brought back.
|
|
cache.set(vec![ripe, vrp("193.0.4.0/23", 24, 15169)]);
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.5.0/24"], 0).await?;
|
|
assert!(
|
|
server.received_routes()[0]
|
|
.attributes
|
|
.contains(&AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN])),
|
|
"the route the peer has now"
|
|
);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A peer can be exempt: its invalid routes are taken, and shown for what
|
|
/// they are.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_a_peer_can_be_exempt_from_validation() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
|
|
let import = ImportPolicy {
|
|
accept_rpki_invalid: true,
|
|
..default_policy()
|
|
};
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, import).await?;
|
|
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
|
|
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
|
|
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
|
|
let routes: Value = reqwest::get(format!("{base}/api/routes/received"))
|
|
.await?
|
|
.json()
|
|
.await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(routes["routes"][0]["rpki"], "invalid");
|
|
assert!(server.refusals.peers().is_empty());
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Validation data that no cache has confirmed for too long is dropped,
|
|
/// and with it every verdict: routes held as invalid are taken. Refusing
|
|
/// routes on the word of data that may be long out of date would be worse.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_held_routes_are_taken_when_the_validation_data_expires() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, PEER_ASN)]).await;
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } =
|
|
server_with(&cache, Some(Duration::from_millis(1500)), default_policy()).await?;
|
|
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
|
|
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 15169).await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
|
|
|
|
drop(cache);
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.4.0/24"], 0).await?;
|
|
assert!(server.rpki.as_ref().unwrap().current().vrps.is_empty());
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A hijack that was possible: on a session with two-octet AS numbers a
|
|
/// route has two paths, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH, and a peer can make them
|
|
/// say different things. Here AS_PATH is the peer alone, and an AS4_PATH
|
|
/// too long to be used ends at the AS that holds the addresses. The route
|
|
/// is the peer's and invalid, when it arrives and when it is looked at
|
|
/// again; nothing may take the unused path's word for where it comes from.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_an_unused_as4_path_does_not_make_a_route_valid() -> Result<()> {
|
|
use bgp_packet::message::AsPathSegment;
|
|
const HOLDER: u32 = 15169;
|
|
let cache = TestCache::start(vec![vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, HOLDER)]).await;
|
|
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, None, default_policy()).await?;
|
|
|
|
// No capabilities: AS numbers are two octets wide on this session.
|
|
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
peer.handshake_with(PEER_ASN, Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 2), 90, vec![])
|
|
.await?;
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while server.registry.list().is_empty() {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
assert!(!server.registry.list()[0].four_octet_asn);
|
|
|
|
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
|
|
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
|
|
path_attributes: vec![
|
|
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
|
|
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN]),
|
|
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1))),
|
|
PathAttribute::As4Path(AsPathAttribute {
|
|
segments: vec![AsPathSegment {
|
|
ordered: true,
|
|
path: vec![3356, HOLDER],
|
|
}],
|
|
}),
|
|
],
|
|
announced_routes: vec![prefix("193.0.4.0/24").into()],
|
|
}))
|
|
.await?;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
|
|
|
|
// The data changes, and every held route is looked at again.
|
|
cache.set(vec![
|
|
vrp("193.0.0.0/21", 24, HOLDER),
|
|
vrp("198.51.100.0/24", 24, 64500),
|
|
]);
|
|
let rpki = server.rpki.clone().unwrap();
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while rpki.current().vrps.len() != 2 {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
// Time enough for the look, and then some.
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(600)).await;
|
|
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|