A peer can now send several routes for one prefix, told apart by a path identifier, and each is a route of its own in the table. Wire: - The ADD-PATH capability lists several address families. It was read as exactly one, so the OPEN of a router offering it for IPv4 and IPv6 was malformed and the session never came up. - Prefixes in UPDATEs are `Nlri`: a prefix and a path identifier. The identifier is on the wire, in the body and in MP_REACH/MP_UNREACH, for the families the session uses ADD-PATH for in that direction. Sending and receiving are settled separately, so a session has one codec context for each. Negotiation: - `add_path` on a peer in the configuration: off (the default), receive, send or both, offered for every family offered to the peer. - In use for a family and a direction when one side offered to send and the other to receive. Shown on /statusz and in /api/peers. Table: - A route is known by its peer and path identifier together. Identifiers are stored only in rows that have a non-zero one, so routes of peers that send one route each cost nothing more. - Equal routes from one peer are chosen between by the lower identifier. - /api/routes/received gives each route's path_id. Journal: - A second journal in each shard records every change to any route, for followers that want all the routes of a prefix and not only the best: RibTable::reader_of_all_routes and Event::Routes. This is what sending several routes to a peer will read. It costs nothing while nobody follows it. Sending: prefixes go out with a path identifier where that was agreed, but there is still one route for each prefix to send: only originated routes are announced. Tested with the table and journal model tests extended to path identifiers and to followers of all routes, the codec property tests and fuzz targets extended to ADD-PATH sessions, and end to end in both directions and for the case where only one side offers it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
316 lines
11 KiB
Rust
316 lines
11 KiB
Rust
//! Connection collision detection (RFC 4271 §6.8) against a live server.
|
|
//!
|
|
//! The test server's BGP Identifier is 127.0.0.1. A test peer picks an
|
|
//! identifier above or below that to steer which connection must survive.
|
|
|
|
use std::net::{Ipv4Addr, SocketAddr};
|
|
use std::time::Duration;
|
|
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::test_peer::TestPeer;
|
|
use bgp_integration_tests::test_server::TestServer;
|
|
use bgp_packet::errors::{BgpError, CeaseSubcode, OpenMsgSubcode};
|
|
use bgp_packet::message::{
|
|
AsPathAttribute, Message, NextHopPathAttribute, NotificationMessage, OriginPathAttribute,
|
|
PathAttribute, UpdateMessage,
|
|
};
|
|
use bgp_primitives::ip_prefix::IpPrefix;
|
|
use bgp_rib::{LocalRoute, LocalRouteAttrs};
|
|
use bgp_server::collision::Direction;
|
|
use bgp_server::config::PeerConfig;
|
|
use bgp_server::family::FamilySet;
|
|
use eyre::Result;
|
|
use tokio::net::TcpListener;
|
|
|
|
const LOCAL_ASN: u32 = 65000;
|
|
const PEER_ASN: u32 = 65001;
|
|
const TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(5);
|
|
|
|
/// Above the server's 127.0.0.1.
|
|
const HIGH_ID: Ipv4Addr = Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1);
|
|
/// Below the server's 127.0.0.1.
|
|
const LOW_ID: Ipv4Addr = Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 1);
|
|
|
|
async fn server_dialing(listener: &TcpListener) -> Result<TestServer> {
|
|
let endpoint: SocketAddr = listener.local_addr()?;
|
|
TestServer::start_with(LOCAL_ASN, |c| {
|
|
c.connect_retry = Duration::from_millis(200);
|
|
c.peers = vec![PeerConfig {
|
|
name: "r1".into(),
|
|
endpoint,
|
|
remote_asn: PEER_ASN,
|
|
hold_time_secs: 90,
|
|
local_address: None,
|
|
families: FamilySet::supported(),
|
|
add_path: None,
|
|
}];
|
|
})
|
|
.await
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Exchanges OPENs only, leaving the server's side in OpenConfirm (it has
|
|
/// sent its KEEPALIVE and is waiting for ours).
|
|
async fn open_only(peer: &mut TestPeer, router_id: Ipv4Addr) -> Result<()> {
|
|
peer.send_open(PEER_ASN, router_id, 90).await?;
|
|
peer.recv_open().await?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Finishes the handshake begun by [`open_only`].
|
|
async fn confirm(peer: &mut TestPeer) -> Result<()> {
|
|
match tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, peer.recv()).await?? {
|
|
Message::KeepAlive => {}
|
|
other => eyre::bail!("expected KEEPALIVE, got {other:?}"),
|
|
}
|
|
peer.send(&Message::KeepAlive).await
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Reads until a NOTIFICATION arrives, skipping KEEPALIVEs.
|
|
async fn expect_notification(peer: &mut TestPeer) -> Result<NotificationMessage> {
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
loop {
|
|
match peer.recv().await? {
|
|
Message::Notification(n) => return Ok(n),
|
|
Message::KeepAlive => {}
|
|
other => eyre::bail!("expected NOTIFICATION, got {other:?}"),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn is_collision_cease(n: &NotificationMessage) -> bool {
|
|
matches!(
|
|
n.error,
|
|
BgpError::Cease(CeaseSubcode::ConnCollisionResolution)
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async fn wait_for_sessions(server: &TestServer, n: usize) -> Result<()> {
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while server.registry.list().len() != n {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Peer has the higher identifier, so the connection the *peer* initiated
|
|
/// must survive: the server closes its own outbound connection.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_simultaneous_open_peer_higher_keeps_inbound() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
|
|
let server = server_dialing(&listener).await?;
|
|
|
|
// Server's outbound connection reaches OpenConfirm.
|
|
let (stream, _) = tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, listener.accept()).await??;
|
|
let mut dialled = TestPeer::from_stream(stream);
|
|
open_only(&mut dialled, HIGH_ID).await?;
|
|
|
|
// The peer now also dials the server.
|
|
let mut inbound = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut inbound, HIGH_ID).await?;
|
|
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut dialled).await?;
|
|
assert!(is_collision_cease(¬if), "{notif:?}");
|
|
assert!(dialled.is_closed().await);
|
|
|
|
confirm(&mut inbound).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
let session = server.registry.list().remove(0);
|
|
assert_eq!(session.direction, Direction::Inbound);
|
|
assert_eq!(session.name.as_deref(), Some("r1"));
|
|
|
|
// The survivor is fully functional.
|
|
server
|
|
.local_rib
|
|
.announce(LocalRoute::new(
|
|
IpPrefix::try_from("10.100.1.0/24")?,
|
|
LocalRouteAttrs::default(),
|
|
))
|
|
.await?;
|
|
let update = tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, inbound.recv_update()).await??;
|
|
assert_eq!(update.announced_routes[0].to_string(), "10.100.1.0/24");
|
|
|
|
// The dialer notices the surviving session and does not open another.
|
|
let extra = tokio::time::timeout(Duration::from_millis(700), listener.accept()).await;
|
|
assert!(
|
|
extra.is_err(),
|
|
"dialer opened a second connection despite an established session"
|
|
);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Peer has the lower identifier, so the connection the *server* initiated
|
|
/// must survive: the peer's inbound connection is refused.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_simultaneous_open_peer_lower_keeps_outbound() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
|
|
let server = server_dialing(&listener).await?;
|
|
|
|
let (stream, _) = tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, listener.accept()).await??;
|
|
let mut dialled = TestPeer::from_stream(stream);
|
|
open_only(&mut dialled, LOW_ID).await?;
|
|
|
|
let mut inbound = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut inbound, LOW_ID).await?;
|
|
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut inbound).await?;
|
|
assert!(is_collision_cease(¬if), "{notif:?}");
|
|
assert!(inbound.is_closed().await);
|
|
|
|
confirm(&mut dialled).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(server.registry.list()[0].direction, Direction::Outbound);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// The order in which the two OPENs are processed must not change the
|
|
/// outcome: here the inbound connection reaches OpenConfirm first.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_outcome_is_independent_of_arrival_order() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
|
|
let server = server_dialing(&listener).await?;
|
|
|
|
let (stream, _) = tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, listener.accept()).await??;
|
|
let mut dialled = TestPeer::from_stream(stream);
|
|
|
|
// Inbound first this time; peer is lower so outbound must still win.
|
|
let mut inbound = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut inbound, LOW_ID).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut dialled, LOW_ID).await?;
|
|
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut inbound).await?;
|
|
assert!(is_collision_cease(¬if), "{notif:?}");
|
|
|
|
confirm(&mut dialled).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
assert_eq!(server.registry.list()[0].direction, Direction::Outbound);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// RFC default: a collision with an Established session closes the new
|
|
/// connection, whatever the identifiers say.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_established_session_wins_by_default() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let server = TestServer::start(LOCAL_ASN).await?;
|
|
|
|
let mut first = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
first.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
|
|
let mut second = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut second, HIGH_ID).await?;
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut second).await?;
|
|
assert!(is_collision_cease(¬if), "{notif:?}");
|
|
|
|
// The original is untouched.
|
|
assert_eq!(server.registry.list().len(), 1);
|
|
server
|
|
.local_rib
|
|
.announce(LocalRoute::new(
|
|
IpPrefix::try_from("10.100.1.0/24")?,
|
|
LocalRouteAttrs::default(),
|
|
))
|
|
.await?;
|
|
let update = tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, first.recv_update()).await??;
|
|
assert_eq!(update.announced_routes[0].to_string(), "10.100.1.0/24");
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// With collision_detect_established_state, a peer that restarts and dials
|
|
/// again replaces the stale session at once, and the routes learned over the
|
|
/// old session are flushed.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_restarted_peer_replaces_stale_session_when_enabled() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let server =
|
|
TestServer::start_with(LOCAL_ASN, |c| c.collision_detect_established_state = true).await?;
|
|
|
|
let mut stale = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
stale.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
stale
|
|
.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
|
|
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
|
|
path_attributes: vec![
|
|
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
|
|
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(vec![PEER_ASN]),
|
|
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 9))),
|
|
],
|
|
announced_routes: vec![IpPrefix::try_from("203.0.113.0/24")?.into()],
|
|
}))
|
|
.await?;
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
while server.received_routes().is_empty() {
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
let stale_addr = server.registry.list()[0].peer.addr;
|
|
|
|
// "Restart": a fresh connection from the same router.
|
|
let mut fresh = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
fresh.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut stale).await?;
|
|
assert!(is_collision_cease(¬if), "{notif:?}");
|
|
|
|
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
|
|
loop {
|
|
let sessions = server.registry.list();
|
|
if sessions.len() == 1 && sessions[0].peer.addr != stale_addr {
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(10)).await;
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
.await?;
|
|
assert!(
|
|
server.received_routes().is_empty(),
|
|
"stale routes were not flushed"
|
|
);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Different routers (different identifiers) never collide.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_distinct_identifiers_do_not_collide() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let server = TestServer::start(LOCAL_ASN).await?;
|
|
let mut a = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
a.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
let mut b = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
b.handshake(PEER_ASN, LOW_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 2).await?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A failed connection frees its slot: the same router can come back.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_identifier_is_released_when_connection_ends() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let server = TestServer::start(LOCAL_ASN).await?;
|
|
let mut first = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
first.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
drop(first);
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 0).await?;
|
|
|
|
let mut second = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
second.handshake(PEER_ASN, HIGH_ID, 90).await?;
|
|
wait_for_sessions(&server, 1).await?;
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// A peer claiming our own identifier is refused outright.
|
|
#[tokio::test]
|
|
async fn test_peer_with_our_identifier_is_refused() -> Result<()> {
|
|
let server = TestServer::start(LOCAL_ASN).await?;
|
|
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
|
|
open_only(&mut peer, Ipv4Addr::new(127, 0, 0, 1)).await?;
|
|
let notif = expect_notification(&mut peer).await?;
|
|
assert!(
|
|
matches!(notif.error, BgpError::OpenMsg(OpenMsgSubcode::BadBgpId)),
|
|
"{notif:?}"
|
|
);
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
}
|