Commit Graph
10 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 cbf0df1eef Policy scripts: the operator's own rules for routes, in Rhai
A new crate, bgp-policy, runs functions of a script on routes: on their
way in, after the general checks of a peer's import and before the
checks that can change (RPKI, next hop reachability); and on their way
out to a peer. A function is given the route and the peer, may refuse
the route, and may change its communities, large communities,
LOCAL_PREF and MED, and on the way out prepend our AS:

    fn from_peer(route, peer) {
        if route.has_community("65535:666") { return false; }
        route.add_community(LEARNED_FROM[peer.role]);
        route.local_pref = PREFERENCE[peer.role];
        true
    }

Configuration: policy { path | source, import_function, export_function }
and, for a peer, import { function } and export { function }. The script
is compiled at startup; `bgp --check` reads it and says which function
is whose. A function that fails on a route has refused it. Scripts have
no files, network or clock, and are stopped after 200,000 steps.

Route selection now goes by a LOCAL_PREF on a route from an external
peer: the decoder never lets a peer's own through, so one that is there
was set by policy.

What it costs was measured before it was built on (benches/policy.rs):
a call that tests a few communities and changes two takes 1 to 3
microseconds, some two hundred times what Rust would. So a function is
asked once for the routes of an UPDATE, which share their attributes,
unless it asks for the prefix. One peer sending 1.23 M routes over a
session: 0.37 s without a function, 0.80 s with one that marks and
ranks every route, 3.4 s if it also looks at the prefix.

Export applies to what is announced, which today is what the daemon
originates; learned routes are not passed on yet.

Tested by unit tests of the crate, sessions end to end, a fuzz target on
the example script (testdata/policy.rhai), and a lab phase in which a
script changes which of FRR's and BIRD's route is chosen and what each
of them is told.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 21:09:39 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 f1d80c66df Do not choose a route whose next hop cannot be reached (RFC 4271 §9.1.2.1)
Where routes go into the kernel, a route the kernel could not be given
is no longer taken into the table: its next hop is no neighbor on any
interface, or its prefix is a network the machine is itself on. Such a
route used to be able to win selection and then leave its prefix without
a route in the kernel, though another peer had one that worked.

It is held aside the way an RPKI-invalid route is, and by the same
means: judged on arrival against the interfaces as the kernel last
described them, looked for in the table when they change, and taken
from what is held when its next hop can be reached. The fib publishes
the interfaces for this; the next hop is resolved once for an UPDATE
and not for each of its routes.

The lab has a phase, nexthops: FRR's better route with a next hop that
is nowhere is held and BIRD's is installed, and they change places as
an address comes and goes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 20:29:31 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 3d946c32ce Code health after review: docs, metrics, structure, one more fuzz target
What the code-health review found, and what a fuzz target written for it
found in its first seconds.

- A set of attributes with the same attribute twice is refused by the
  routing table. Its readers (the selection key, the path, the next hop)
  could each take a different one of the two. The decoder never lets one
  through; the new fuzz target `attrs` found that the table would.
- bgp_peer_up{peer}, to alert on a peer going away, and bgp_build_info.
  Every metric is there from the first scrape. Alerts for a peer down,
  hijack attempts and kernel errors are in the README.
- `bgp --check config` validates a configuration without starting, and
  `--version` says which build it is. CI runs the first on the example
  configuration, which a test now also parses with its commented fields
  put in; the example had to learn about the next hop check.
- Path attributes have a module of their own, packet::attributes,
  re-exported from packet::message as before.
- policy::From, which shadowed the trait, is RouteSource. The server's
  connection, dialer and fsm modules are private. Logging arguments live
  in the binary; the server library no longer depends on clap.
- One is_unicast_link_local (the standard library's) instead of two of
  our own; SelectionKey::origin(); one place where an Import is made.
- READMEs say what the daemon does today rather than what it did not do
  a year ago. Documentation links are checked in CI. Unused dependencies
  and bgp_web::serve are gone; the Docker build is --locked and does not
  ship the fuzz corpus.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 19:31:19 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 9ca86ede2f Harden import, the kernel task and the RTR client after review
Three independent reviews (hijack resistance, reliability, code health)
of the whole tree. This is what they found that could let a bad route in
or take the daemon down.

Hijacks:
- A route had two paths on a two-octet session, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH,
  read in two places by two rules. A peer could make the origin checked
  on import differ from the one checked at revalidation, and get an
  RPKI-invalid route into the table. AS4_PATH is now merged into AS_PATH
  once, on receipt (RFC 6793 §4.2.3), and nothing else knows of it.
- The next hop is judged on import: it must be usable, agreed on
  (RFC 8950), and by default the peer itself.
- Our own originated prefixes are not taken from other networks.
- A route for a network the machine is on is never put in the kernel.
- Paths with an AS_SET are refused (RFC 9774).
- A configured peer gets one session, not one per BGP Identifier.
- More IPv6 special-purpose prefixes are bogons.

Reliability:
- A batch of requests the kernel refused could overflow the netlink
  socket and end the daemon. The socket has room now, a lost answer or a
  silent kernel means asking what is there, and neither is fatal.
- Working the routes out again within the grace period after a restart
  no longer drops the routes being kept.
- That work can no longer be put off for ever by interface changes.
- Peers whose sessions keep failing are slowed down.
- Unused attribute sets are swept when they pile up, not only each
  minute.
- Log lines a peer can cause are said once in a while.
- An RTR answer is bounded in size and time; data cannot expire between
  two refreshes.
- The shard of a key is taken from a stirred hash: neighbouring bits of
  the hash proved alike for prefixes in a row. The test that showed it,
  failing one run in sixteen, is deterministic now.

The lab has a phase, hijacks, in which FRR tries the first three.
route::apply is a struct with methods instead of nested closures, and
the kernel task's loop is shorter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 19:13:40 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 fd2248feb5 Peer at link-local addresses: fe80::1%eth0
A peer's endpoint may be a link-local IPv6 address with the interface it
is on. Such a peer is the address and the interface together, wherever
peers are told apart: admission, collisions, hold-downs, the refusal log,
the status page. The interface is looked up by name each time it is
needed, so one that appears later or is made anew is found.

Our routes go out with our link-local address in both places of
MP_REACH_NLRI's next hop, as FRR sends its own. A peer's link-local next
hop is taken alone, twice, or after "::" (BIRD), and resolved in the
kernel on the interface of the session rather than by looking fe80::/64
up, which every interface has.

The lab has a new phase, linklocal: sessions with FRR (by interface, with
radvd beside the daemon) and BIRD over a LAN with link-local addresses
only, both families, pings across, the interface down and up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 18:24:13 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 f9ef781d51 Check roles in OPEN and prevent route leaks with Only to Customer (RFC 9234)
A peer's configured role now does three more things:

- Our OPEN carries the BGP Role capability with what we are to the peer.
  A peer whose own says it is something that does not pair with that, or
  that sends two different roles, is refused with OPEN Message Error /
  Role Mismatch. A peer that says nothing is accepted unless require_role
  is set. A role on a peer in our own AS is a configuration error.
- Routes from a provider, a peer or a route server are marked Only to
  Customer on the way in if they are not already, and our routes are
  marked on the way out to a customer, a peer or a route server client.
- A marked route from a customer or route server client, or from a peer
  with someone else's mark, is a leak and is refused. No policy setting
  turns that off.

The packet crate gains the Only to Customer attribute (malformed:
treat-as-withdraw), and the Role Mismatch subcode is corrected from 8 to
11.

The status page shows whether the peer confirmed its role.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:27:36 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 8086aa994f Verify AS paths with ASPAs, over RTR version 2
Origin validation says who may originate a prefix and nothing about the
rest of the path: it does not catch a route leak, nor a hijack that keeps
the right origin at the end of a made-up path. ASPAs, in which a network
lists its providers, do.

bgp-rpki:
- aspa: the ASPAs and the upstream and downstream verification procedures
  of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-24, tested against the draft's
  wording as written.
- rtr: protocol version 2 (draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-23) with the ASPA
  PDU and the new error codes.
- client: asks for version 2 and falls back to whatever older version the
  cache speaks; keeps ASPAs with the VRPs, applied whole or not at all;
  publishes which customers' ASPAs changed; tells the cache why it is
  being left (Error Report); does not ask one version's serial of another.

Server:
- A peer has a role (provider, customer, peer, route server, route server
  client), which decides how its paths are verified. Without one they are
  not.
- A route whose path is invalid is refused ("ASPA invalid") and held, like
  one with an invalid origin; accept_aspa_invalid exempts a peer.
- When ASPAs change, routes in the table whose path has a changed customer
  on it are verified again, and held routes are released when they pass
  both checks.
- The revalidator finds a route's peer by index instead of searching a
  list for every route.

The status page and API show each peer's role, each route's path validity,
the number of ASPAs and the RTR version in use; bgp_rpki_aspas is on
/metricz.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 14:12:59 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 bdaf226a16 Validate route origins against the RPKI and refuse invalid routes
With rpki { caches { ... } } in the configuration the server keeps the
validated ROA payloads of a validator and validates every route from a
peer outside its own AS (RFC 6811). An invalid route is refused, unless
its peer has accept_rpki_invalid. Valid and not-found routes are taken;
validity does not otherwise enter route selection.

Validity is not settled when a route arrives: the data changes every few
minutes. The routes follow, without the peer sending anything again.

- A route refused as invalid is held by its session, out of the table.
  When the data changes the session looks at what it holds, and what is
  no longer invalid goes into the table. A held route is the peer's to
  withdraw or replace like any other.
- A route in the table that becomes invalid is found by a task that
  looks through the table when the data changes, at the prefixes the
  changed VRPs cover, and is taken out and held by its session.
- If the data expires because no cache confirms it, nothing is invalid
  any more and everything held is taken.
- A session holds at most 200,000 routes; past that it asks the peer for
  a route refresh when the data changes.

So that the table can be looked through without parsing attributes, an
attribute set's key now has the route's origin AS. Memory per route is
unchanged at 52 bytes on the real table.

Shown: /api/rpki and a section of the status page with the cache, its
state and the age of the data; each route's validity; each peer's count
of held routes. Refusals are recorded under "RPKI invalid". Metrics:
bgp_rpki_vrps and bgp_rpki_updates_total.

Also: Negotiated says whether the peer supports route refresh, and
docs/RFCs.md is brought up to date.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 13:39:40 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 599cd0ad8b Look routes up, and see and alert on the ones that were refused
Two things were hard to find out from the status page and the API: what
the table has for a given prefix or address, and what a peer announced
that was refused and why.

Looking up. /api/routes/received takes a query, and the status page has
a box for it:
- prefix: every route for that prefix, the best first;
- address: every prefix that covers the address, most specific first;
- within: a prefix and everything inside it;
- peer (by name or address) and best narrow any of these.
A query that makes no sense is answered 400 with the reason, which the
page shows. Results come in address order. Routes are shown with the
peer's configured name.

Refused routes. A refused route is not stored, so until now there was
only a count. For each peer the server now keeps how many routes were
refused for each reason, and the latest 200 with the AS path they came
with. The record is kept by the peer's address and outlives the
session, so that a peer that was cut off can still be looked into. It is
at /api/routes/rejected and in a new section of the status page; the
peers table links to it.

Alerting. bgp_routes_rejected_total is now by peer as well as reason.
New: bgp_peer_routes and bgp_peer_max_prefixes, to see a peer nearing
its limit, and bgp_prefix_limit_exceeded_total. The README has rules to
start from. The log has a line for a peer's first refused route and
then at most one a minute, with the count of the others.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 13:14:41 +02:00
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 e2b1979e38 Judge every route a peer announces: import policy, prefix limit, hold-down
A configured peer could announce any prefix with any path, in any
number, and all of it was stored and could be chosen as best. Each
peer now has an import policy, and every route goes through it before
it reaches the routing table.

Checks that hold for any peer unless turned off for it:
- no prefixes that are not routed on the Internet (private, loopback,
  link-local, documentation, multicast, reserved; for IPv6, anything
  outside global unicast);
- nothing longer than /24 or /48, no default route, nothing shorter
  than /8 or /16;
- no reserved, private or documentation AS number in the path;
- a path that begins with the peer's own AS (turned off for a route
  server), and of at most 64 AS numbers.

Always: a route with our own AS number in its path is refused. RFC 4271
requires this loop check and it was missing.

Per peer, if configured: the prefixes it may announce, each with an
optional longest more-specific, and the AS numbers its routes may
originate from. This is the list generated from the routing registries.

max_prefixes limits how many routes a peer may have. One more ends the
session with Cease / Maximum Number of Prefixes Reached, and the peer
is kept down for hold_down_seconds (ten minutes unless set): its
connections are not taken and it is not dialled. Refused routes do not
count towards the limit.

A refused route is withdrawn rather than ignored, so that it replaces
whatever the peer had announced for it before.

On a session with two-octet AS numbers the path is judged with its
AS4_PATH merged in, so that the real AS numbers are what is checked.

Peers that are not configured (accept_unconfigured_peers, for test
networks) get a policy that takes everything but loops.

Refusals are counted in bgp_routes_rejected_total by reason. The status
page and /api/peers show, for each session, how many routes the peer
has and how many were refused. The server warns at startup about peers
with no limit.

The prefix check costs about 4 ns a route with the default policy; the
end-to-end benchmark is unchanged.

Also: the benchmark's server AS is one that is in none of its generated
paths, and a table test that depended on the hasher's seed is fixed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-02 12:59:37 +02:00