A new crate, bgp-policy, runs functions of a script on routes: on their
way in, after the general checks of a peer's import and before the
checks that can change (RPKI, next hop reachability); and on their way
out to a peer. A function is given the route and the peer, may refuse
the route, and may change its communities, large communities,
LOCAL_PREF and MED, and on the way out prepend our AS:
fn from_peer(route, peer) {
if route.has_community("65535:666") { return false; }
route.add_community(LEARNED_FROM[peer.role]);
route.local_pref = PREFERENCE[peer.role];
true
}
Configuration: policy { path | source, import_function, export_function }
and, for a peer, import { function } and export { function }. The script
is compiled at startup; `bgp --check` reads it and says which function
is whose. A function that fails on a route has refused it. Scripts have
no files, network or clock, and are stopped after 200,000 steps.
Route selection now goes by a LOCAL_PREF on a route from an external
peer: the decoder never lets a peer's own through, so one that is there
was set by policy.
What it costs was measured before it was built on (benches/policy.rs):
a call that tests a few communities and changes two takes 1 to 3
microseconds, some two hundred times what Rust would. So a function is
asked once for the routes of an UPDATE, which share their attributes,
unless it asks for the prefix. One peer sending 1.23 M routes over a
session: 0.37 s without a function, 0.80 s with one that marks and
ranks every route, 3.4 s if it also looks at the prefix.
Export applies to what is announced, which today is what the daemon
originates; learned routes are not passed on yet.
Tested by unit tests of the crate, sessions end to end, a fuzz target on
the example script (testdata/policy.rhai), and a lab phase in which a
script changes which of FRR's and BIRD's route is chosen and what each
of them is told.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three independent reviews (hijack resistance, reliability, code health)
of the whole tree. This is what they found that could let a bad route in
or take the daemon down.
Hijacks:
- A route had two paths on a two-octet session, AS_PATH and AS4_PATH,
read in two places by two rules. A peer could make the origin checked
on import differ from the one checked at revalidation, and get an
RPKI-invalid route into the table. AS4_PATH is now merged into AS_PATH
once, on receipt (RFC 6793 §4.2.3), and nothing else knows of it.
- The next hop is judged on import: it must be usable, agreed on
(RFC 8950), and by default the peer itself.
- Our own originated prefixes are not taken from other networks.
- A route for a network the machine is on is never put in the kernel.
- Paths with an AS_SET are refused (RFC 9774).
- A configured peer gets one session, not one per BGP Identifier.
- More IPv6 special-purpose prefixes are bogons.
Reliability:
- A batch of requests the kernel refused could overflow the netlink
socket and end the daemon. The socket has room now, a lost answer or a
silent kernel means asking what is there, and neither is fatal.
- Working the routes out again within the grace period after a restart
no longer drops the routes being kept.
- That work can no longer be put off for ever by interface changes.
- Peers whose sessions keep failing are slowed down.
- Unused attribute sets are swept when they pile up, not only each
minute.
- Log lines a peer can cause are said once in a while.
- An RTR answer is bounded in size and time; data cannot expire between
two refreshes.
- The shard of a key is taken from a stirred hash: neighbouring bits of
the hash proved alike for prefixes in a row. The test that showed it,
failing one run in sixteen, is deterministic now.
The lab has a phase, hijacks, in which FRR tries the first three.
route::apply is a struct with methods instead of nested closures, and
the kernel task's loop is shorter.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A peer's endpoint may be a link-local IPv6 address with the interface it
is on. Such a peer is the address and the interface together, wherever
peers are told apart: admission, collisions, hold-downs, the refusal log,
the status page. The interface is looked up by name each time it is
needed, so one that appears later or is made anew is found.
Our routes go out with our link-local address in both places of
MP_REACH_NLRI's next hop, as FRR sends its own. A peer's link-local next
hop is taken alone, twice, or after "::" (BIRD), and resolved in the
kernel on the interface of the session rather than by looking fe80::/64
up, which every interface has.
The lab has a new phase, linklocal: sessions with FRR (by interface, with
radvd beside the daemon) and BIRD over a LAN with link-local addresses
only, both families, pings across, the interface down and up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
/api/routes/received now returns one page: {routes, next_after,
prev_before}. Pages are in prefix order and begin at a prefix (after= or
before=), not at a count, so a table that changes between two pages does
not make them overlap or leave a gap. A page holds whole prefixes, about
`limit` routes' worth.
The table keeps prefixes in no order, so a page is found by looking at
every prefix once and keeping the nearest few; the routes of the others
are not touched (RibTable::for_each_prefix).
The status page shows about 100 routes with first / previous / next
links; the place is kept in the page's address with the lookup.
The response of /api/routes/received was an array before: this changes
its shape.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A peer's configured role now does three more things:
- Our OPEN carries the BGP Role capability with what we are to the peer.
A peer whose own says it is something that does not pair with that, or
that sends two different roles, is refused with OPEN Message Error /
Role Mismatch. A peer that says nothing is accepted unless require_role
is set. A role on a peer in our own AS is a configuration error.
- Routes from a provider, a peer or a route server are marked Only to
Customer on the way in if they are not already, and our routes are
marked on the way out to a customer, a peer or a route server client.
- A marked route from a customer or route server client, or from a peer
with someone else's mark, is a leak and is refused. No policy setting
turns that off.
The packet crate gains the Only to Customer attribute (malformed:
treat-as-withdraw), and the Role Mismatch subcode is corrected from 8 to
11.
The status page shows whether the peer confirmed its role.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Origin validation says who may originate a prefix and nothing about the
rest of the path: it does not catch a route leak, nor a hijack that keeps
the right origin at the end of a made-up path. ASPAs, in which a network
lists its providers, do.
bgp-rpki:
- aspa: the ASPAs and the upstream and downstream verification procedures
of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-24, tested against the draft's
wording as written.
- rtr: protocol version 2 (draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-23) with the ASPA
PDU and the new error codes.
- client: asks for version 2 and falls back to whatever older version the
cache speaks; keeps ASPAs with the VRPs, applied whole or not at all;
publishes which customers' ASPAs changed; tells the cache why it is
being left (Error Report); does not ask one version's serial of another.
Server:
- A peer has a role (provider, customer, peer, route server, route server
client), which decides how its paths are verified. Without one they are
not.
- A route whose path is invalid is refused ("ASPA invalid") and held, like
one with an invalid origin; accept_aspa_invalid exempts a peer.
- When ASPAs change, routes in the table whose path has a changed customer
on it are verified again, and held routes are released when they pass
both checks.
- The revalidator finds a route's peer by index instead of searching a
list for every route.
The status page and API show each peer's role, each route's path validity,
the number of ASPAs and the RTR version in use; bgp_rpki_aspas is on
/metricz.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two things were hard to find out from the status page and the API: what
the table has for a given prefix or address, and what a peer announced
that was refused and why.
Looking up. /api/routes/received takes a query, and the status page has
a box for it:
- prefix: every route for that prefix, the best first;
- address: every prefix that covers the address, most specific first;
- within: a prefix and everything inside it;
- peer (by name or address) and best narrow any of these.
A query that makes no sense is answered 400 with the reason, which the
page shows. Results come in address order. Routes are shown with the
peer's configured name.
Refused routes. A refused route is not stored, so until now there was
only a count. For each peer the server now keeps how many routes were
refused for each reason, and the latest 200 with the AS path they came
with. The record is kept by the peer's address and outlives the
session, so that a peer that was cut off can still be looked into. It is
at /api/routes/rejected and in a new section of the status page; the
peers table links to it.
Alerting. bgp_routes_rejected_total is now by peer as well as reason.
New: bgp_peer_routes and bgp_peer_max_prefixes, to see a peer nearing
its limit, and bgp_prefix_limit_exceeded_total. The README has rules to
start from. The log has a line for a peer's first refused route and
then at most one a minute, with the count of the others.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
