Verify AS paths with ASPAs, over RTR version 2

Origin validation says who may originate a prefix and nothing about the
rest of the path: it does not catch a route leak, nor a hijack that keeps
the right origin at the end of a made-up path. ASPAs, in which a network
lists its providers, do.

bgp-rpki:
- aspa: the ASPAs and the upstream and downstream verification procedures
  of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification-24, tested against the draft's
  wording as written.
- rtr: protocol version 2 (draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-23) with the ASPA
  PDU and the new error codes.
- client: asks for version 2 and falls back to whatever older version the
  cache speaks; keeps ASPAs with the VRPs, applied whole or not at all;
  publishes which customers' ASPAs changed; tells the cache why it is
  being left (Error Report); does not ask one version's serial of another.

Server:
- A peer has a role (provider, customer, peer, route server, route server
  client), which decides how its paths are verified. Without one they are
  not.
- A route whose path is invalid is refused ("ASPA invalid") and held, like
  one with an invalid origin; accept_aspa_invalid exempts a peer.
- When ASPAs change, routes in the table whose path has a changed customer
  on it are verified again, and held routes are released when they pass
  both checks.
- The revalidator finds a route's peer by index instead of searching a
  list for every route.

The status page and API show each peer's role, each route's path validity,
the number of ASPAs and the RTR version in use; bgp_rpki_aspas is on
/metricz.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rayhaan JaufeerallyandClaude Fable 5.1 committed 2026-10-02 14:12:59 +02:00
1 parent bdaf226a16
commit 8086aa994f
35 files changed
+2484 -359

No files matched your search

+352
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
//! AS path verification with ASPAs, end to end: a server that gets ASPAs
//! from a cache, a peer that announces routes, and the ASPAs changing
//! under both.
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use std::net::Ipv4Addr;
use std::time::Duration;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_cache::TestCache;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_peer::TestPeer;
use bgp_integration_tests::test_server::TestServer;
use bgp_packet::message::{
AsPathAttribute, Message, NextHopPathAttribute, OriginPathAttribute, PathAttribute,
UpdateMessage,
};
use bgp_primitives::ip_prefix::IpPrefix;
use bgp_rpki::{CacheState, RpkiConfig};
use bgp_server::config::PeerConfig;
use bgp_server::family::FamilySet;
use bgp_server::policy::{ImportPolicy, PeerRole};
use eyre::Result;
use serde_json::Value;
use tokio::net::TcpListener;
const LOCAL_ASN: u32 = 1299;
const PEER_ASN: u32 = 3333;
const TIMEOUT: Duration = Duration::from_secs(5);
fn prefix(s: &str) -> IpPrefix {
IpPrefix::try_from(s).unwrap()
}
/// What a test holds on to: the server, and the listener its dialling
/// goes to.
struct Setup {
server: TestServer,
_listener: TcpListener,
}
/// A server that validates against `cache`, with one configured peer at
/// the address the test connects from, which is `role` to it. Returns once
/// the server has the cache's data.
async fn server_with(
cache: &TestCache,
role: Option<PeerRole>,
import: ImportPolicy,
) -> Result<Setup> {
let listener = TcpListener::bind((Ipv4Addr::LOCALHOST, 0)).await?;
let endpoint = listener.local_addr()?;
let cache = cache.address();
let server = TestServer::start_with(LOCAL_ASN, |c| {
c.accept_unconfigured_peers = false;
c.rpki = Some(RpkiConfig {
caches: vec![cache],
retry: Some(Duration::from_millis(100)),
..RpkiConfig::default()
});
c.peers = vec![PeerConfig {
name: "r1".into(),
endpoint,
remote_asn: PEER_ASN,
hold_time_secs: 90,
local_address: None,
families: FamilySet::supported(),
add_path: None,
import,
role,
}];
})
.await?;
let rpki = server.rpki.clone().expect("validation is configured");
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while rpki.status().state != CacheState::Synchronised {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
Ok(Setup {
server,
_listener: listener,
})
}
async fn established(server: &TestServer) -> Result<TestPeer> {
let mut peer = TestPeer::connect(server.addr).await?;
peer.handshake(PEER_ASN, Ipv4Addr::new(10, 0, 0, 2), 90)
.await?;
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while server.registry.list().is_empty() {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await?;
Ok(peer)
}
/// Announces `prefixes` with the AS path `path`.
async fn announce(peer: &mut TestPeer, prefixes: &[&str], path: &[u32]) -> Result<()> {
peer.send(&Message::Update(UpdateMessage {
withdrawn_routes: vec![],
path_attributes: vec![
PathAttribute::Origin(OriginPathAttribute::IGP),
AsPathAttribute::from_asns(path.to_vec()),
PathAttribute::NextHop(NextHopPathAttribute(Ipv4Addr::new(192, 0, 2, 1))),
],
announced_routes: prefixes.iter().map(|p| prefix(p).into()).collect(),
}))
.await
}
/// Waits until the table holds exactly `expected` and the peer has `held`
/// routes held aside.
async fn table_becomes(server: &TestServer, expected: &[&str], held: u64) -> Result<()> {
let expected: BTreeSet<String> = expected.iter().map(|p| p.to_string()).collect();
let table = || -> BTreeSet<String> {
server
.received_routes()
.iter()
.map(|route| route.prefix.to_string())
.collect()
};
let held_now = || {
server
.registry
.list()
.first()
.map_or(0, |session| session.counters.held())
};
tokio::time::timeout(TIMEOUT, async {
while table() != expected || held_now() != held {
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(5)).await;
}
})
.await
.map_err(|_| {
eyre::eyre!(
"the table has {:?} with {} held; expected {expected:?} with {held} held",
table(),
held_now()
)
})
}
/// AS 15169 buys from 3356 and says so; 3356 and the peer, 3333, have no
/// providers.
fn aspas() -> Vec<(u32, Vec<u32>)> {
vec![(15169, vec![3356]), (3356, vec![0]), (PEER_ASN, vec![0])]
}
/// A peer that hands us a route it got from one of its own peers is
/// leaking it. The route is refused; routes whose paths are attested, or
/// that nothing is known about, are taken.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_leaked_route_is_refused_and_the_rest_are_taken() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![], aspas()).await;
let Setup { server, .. } =
server_with(&cache, Some(PeerRole::Peer), ImportPolicy::default()).await?;
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
// The peer's own route; one of a customer of its that has no ASPA;
// and 15169's route by way of 3356, which is not for 3333 to pass on
// to a peer: 3356 is not its customer.
announce(&mut peer, &["193.0.0.0/21"], &[PEER_ASN]).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["194.0.0.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 2121]).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["193.0.0.0/21", "194.0.0.0/24"], 1).await?;
let client = reqwest::Client::new();
let get = |path: &str| {
let request = client.get(format!("{base}{path}"));
async move { Ok::<Value, eyre::Report>(request.send().await?.error_for_status()?.json().await?) }
};
let routes = get("/api/routes/received").await?;
let validity: Vec<(&str, &str)> = routes
.as_array()
.unwrap()
.iter()
.map(|r| (r["prefix"].as_str().unwrap(), r["aspa"].as_str().unwrap()))
.collect();
assert_eq!(
validity,
[("193.0.0.0/21", "valid"), ("194.0.0.0/24", "unknown")]
);
let refused = get("/api/routes/rejected").await?;
assert_eq!(
refused[0]["by_reason"],
serde_json::json!({"ASPA invalid": 1})
);
let peers = get("/api/peers").await?;
assert_eq!(peers[0]["role"], "peer");
assert_eq!(peers[0]["held_routes"], 1);
let rpki = get("/api/rpki").await?;
assert_eq!(rpki["aspas"], 3);
assert_eq!(rpki["protocol_version"], 2);
Ok(())
}
/// What a path may look like depends on who it comes from. The same route
/// that a peer may not pass on is in order from a provider, which may hand
/// us anything it has. Where it is not said what the peer is, paths are
/// not verified.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_route_that_has_crossed_a_peering_is_taken_from_a_provider_only() -> Result<()> {
for (role, taken) in [
(Some(PeerRole::Provider), true),
(Some(PeerRole::Customer), false),
(Some(PeerRole::Peer), false),
(Some(PeerRole::RouteServerClient), false),
(None, true),
] {
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![], aspas()).await;
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, role, ImportPolicy::default()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]).await?;
let expected = if taken {
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 0).await
} else {
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await
};
expected.map_err(|e| eyre::eyre!("from a peer that is {role:?}: {e}"))?;
}
Ok(())
}
/// An Internet exchange's route server does not put its AS on the path, so
/// the path need not begin with the route server's AS. A leak is refused
/// across it all the same.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_paths_from_a_route_server_do_not_begin_with_its_as() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![], aspas()).await;
let import = ImportPolicy {
accept_any_first_as: true,
..ImportPolicy::default()
};
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, Some(PeerRole::RouteServer), import).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
// 3356's customer route, as 3356 gave it to the route server.
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[3356, 15169]).await?;
// The same route leaked to the route server by another member.
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.4.0/24"], &[2121, 3356, 15169]).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 1).await
}
/// Validity changes with the ASPAs, and the routes follow: one that was
/// taken goes when its path becomes invalid, and one that was refused is
/// taken when it no longer is. The peer sends nothing more meanwhile.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_routes_follow_the_aspas() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![], aspas()).await;
let Setup { server, .. } =
server_with(&cache, Some(PeerRole::Peer), ImportPolicy::default()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["194.0.0.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 2121]).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["194.0.0.0/24"], 1).await?;
// 2121 says that its only provider is 1101: its route by way of 3333
// is now invalid, and goes.
let mut changed = aspas();
changed.push((2121, vec![1101]));
cache.set_aspas(changed);
table_becomes(&server, &[], 2).await?;
let refused = &server.refusals.peers()[0].1;
assert_eq!(refused.total(), 2);
assert_eq!(refused.recent()[0].prefix, prefix("194.0.0.0/24"));
assert_eq!(&refused.recent()[0].as_path[..], [PEER_ASN, 2121]);
// 3356 becomes a customer of 3333, and 2121 too: both routes come
// back, with the paths they were announced with.
cache.set_aspas(vec![
(15169, vec![3356]),
(3356, vec![PEER_ASN]),
(PEER_ASN, vec![0]),
(2121, vec![1101, PEER_ASN]),
]);
table_becomes(&server, &["194.0.0.0/24", "8.8.8.0/24"], 0).await?;
let paths: BTreeSet<Vec<u32>> = server
.received_routes()
.iter()
.flat_map(|route| &route.attributes)
.filter_map(|attribute| match attribute {
PathAttribute::AsPath(path) => Some(path.segments[0].path.clone()),
_ => None,
})
.collect();
assert_eq!(
paths,
[vec![PEER_ASN, 2121], vec![PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]].into()
);
// The validator loses its ASPAs altogether: nothing is known about
// any path, and nothing is refused.
cache.set_aspas(vec![
(15169, vec![3356]),
(3356, vec![0]),
(PEER_ASN, vec![0]),
]);
table_becomes(&server, &["194.0.0.0/24"], 1).await?;
cache.set_aspas(vec![]);
table_becomes(&server, &["194.0.0.0/24", "8.8.8.0/24"], 0).await
}
/// A peer can be exempt: its routes with invalid paths are taken, and
/// shown for what they are.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_peer_can_be_exempt_from_path_verification() -> Result<()> {
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![], aspas()).await;
let import = ImportPolicy {
accept_aspa_invalid: true,
..ImportPolicy::default()
};
let Setup { server, .. } = server_with(&cache, Some(PeerRole::Peer), import).await?;
let (base, _http) = server.serve_http().await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 0).await?;
let routes: Value = reqwest::get(format!("{base}/api/routes/received"))
.await?
.json()
.await?;
assert_eq!(routes[0]["aspa"], "invalid");
assert!(server.refusals.peers().is_empty());
Ok(())
}
/// A route can fail both checks. It is taken only when it passes both.
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_a_route_is_held_until_origin_and_path_are_both_in_order() -> Result<()> {
let google = |asn| bgp_rpki::Vrp {
prefix: prefix("8.8.8.0/24"),
max_length: 24,
asn,
};
let cache = TestCache::start_with(vec![google(13335)], aspas()).await;
let Setup { server, .. } =
server_with(&cache, Some(PeerRole::Peer), ImportPolicy::default()).await?;
let mut peer = established(&server).await?;
announce(&mut peer, &["8.8.8.0/24"], &[PEER_ASN, 3356, 15169]).await?;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
// The origin is put right; the path is still a leak.
cache.set(vec![google(15169)]);
tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(500)).await;
table_becomes(&server, &[], 1).await?;
cache.set_aspas(vec![(15169, vec![3356]), (3356, vec![PEER_ASN])]);
table_becomes(&server, &["8.8.8.0/24"], 0).await
}